This article presents a biased and incomplete view of sex work, focusing heavily on the negative aspects and neglecting alternative perspectives. While it acknowledges the power imbalances and exploitation within the sex industry, it fails to consider the agency and autonomy of sex workers who choose this profession. The article's reliance on anecdotal evidence and a single study of 854 prostitutes, while citing a 73% physical assault rate, lacks a broader statistical context. It doesn't address the diversity of experiences within the sex industry, nor does it explore harm reduction models or the potential benefits of decriminalization for some sex workers, such as increased safety and access to labor rights. The Nordic model, presented as the ideal solution, is not without its critics who argue it can drive the industry underground, making it more dangerous for sex workers. The article’s language, framing sex work as inherently exploitative and equating it with trafficking, further reveals its bias and undermines a nuanced discussion about the complex realities of the sex industry. While it raises valid concerns about exploitation, it ultimately offers a one-sided argument that ignores the complexities and diverse experiences of those involved in sex work.